This article discusses the fact that public universities have faced the challenge of ensuring the relevance, scientific rigor and fairness through analysis and evaluation of its agencies and its members. Without doubt, the teacher is one of the cornerstones of the quality of the entire educational system. Therefore, the performance evaluation has become a major issue and an essential factor for improving education. It describes the methodological transition teacher evaluation process at the Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, and particularly emphasized that the existence of the meta-evaluation strengthens the rigor, credibility and quality of evaluations. The objective of this work is meta-evaluations the way it carries out the teacher evaluation process from the methodological transition, identifying strengths and areas of opportunity based on the opinion of the members of the Institutional Committee. It included the participation of 89 members of the collegiate body responded to a questionnaire that included sections such as general assessment, successes, issues, impact areas for improvement and satisfaction. The results show a favorable assessment of the overall process and concludes that include the opinions of community members allows evaluators to identify favorable and unfavorable experiences during the evaluation of teaching practice of teachers.

Meta-evaluation, teacher evaluation, institutional assessment.